The Self Government Foundation home page
Title: The Self Government Foundation home page
Keywords: we the people, self government, foundation, tea party, classical liberal, non-partisan, libertarian, defending the constitution, yes we rule
Description: This is the home page of the American, Constitutional Self-Government Foundation is ranked 28576160 in the world (amongst the 40 million domains). A low-numbered rank means that this website gets lots of visitors. This site is relatively popular among users in the united states. It gets 50% of its traffic from the united states .This site is estimated to be worth $805. This site has a low Pagerank(0/10). It has 1 backlinks. has 43% seo score. Information

Website / Domain:
Website IP Address:
Domain DNS Server:, Rank

Alexa Rank: 28576160
Google Page Rank: 0/10 (Google Pagerank Has Been Closed) Traffic & Earnings

Purchase/Sale Value: $805
Daily Revenue: $2
Monthly Revenue $66
Yearly Revenue: $805
Daily Unique Visitors 203
Monthly Unique Visitors: 6,090
Yearly Unique Visitors: 74,095 WebSite Httpheader

StatusCode 200
Content-Type text/html
Date Mon, 08 Aug 2016 01:46:54 GMT
Server LiteSpeed Keywords accounting

Keyword Count Percentage
we the people 0 0.00%
self government 2 0.32%
foundation 1 0.11%
tea party 0 0.00%
classical liberal 0 0.00%
non-partisan 0 0.00%
libertarian 0 0.00%
defending the constitution 0 0.00%
yes we rule 0 0.00% Traffic Sources Chart Similar Website

Domain Site Title Alexa Rank History Chart aleax Html To Plain Text

The Self Government Foundation home page Can we count on living in a free, democratic country for the next foreseeable future? Does our Constitution guarantee our freedom? The Bill of Rights? Our electoral system? Congress? The President? The courts? The military? Not one of these institutions, by itself, can guarantee or maintain our Liberty. There is a balance of powers among our institutions, created by design. Our system of government was designed in a way that not one of the institutions (and no person) could overpower the others. Fortunately our system has worked for over 200 years, but we also know that every generation had to work, fight or even die to defend our freedoms. THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT The genius of the founding fathers created "The American Experiment", supported by a Constitution that allows the people to govern themselves through several institutions and mechanisms that keep each other in check. Indeed, "self government" starts with government of "self" and with individual responsibility. It is then delegated upwards, from the family to the local government, then to the State and eventually to the federal government. We, the people, have agreed to delegate our power to our representatives in Congress, to our President and to the institutions and mechanisms that make government work. We call this representative democracy. We call the United States a republic. The founding fathers used the concepts of "fragmented power", "de-centralized power" and "enumerated powers", as an insurance and protection against the temptation of tyranny, whether by a single person, or by an institution. The framers of the Constitution protected us, the people, by fragmenting the power among three branches of government: the Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative. Furthermore, they fragmented the power in such ways that no particular political faction would take hold of one of these institutions permanently, for example by establishing an election process for the House of Representatives (Article I and Amendment XIV-S.2) and the Senate (Amendment XVII), by establishing electoral colleges for the election of the president (Article II and Amendment XII), and by establishing the process of ordainment of the courts and defining their scope(Article III). More recently (1951) another “power fragmentation” measure was introduced (Amendment XXII) which limits the number of terms a president can serve. Further fragmentation measures could be possible in the future. The second concept protecting the people was de-centralization. The Constitution de-centralized government power by establishing the federal and the State levels of government. Further de-centralization has occurred over the years with the establishment of regional and city levels of government, as the nation develops and the population increases. To reinforce de-centralization, the framers of the Constitution introduced a third protection: the enumerated powers of Congress. The federal government power is limited by Constitution (Article 1, Section 8), in order to maintain the powers of government as close as possible to the people. This was further reinforced as part of the Bill of Rights (Amendment X), to state that the powers not given explicitly to the federal government are reserved for the States and for the people. This division and decentralization of powers also allowed for more localized government experiments at the State level and at lower levels. The people could choose different governments in different States, could assess the long term effects of specific government policies and could choose the government for their State that had the best record in other States. Failing that, people always had the option of relocating to a State with policies consistent with their principles. A healthy economy, in addition to the removal of inter-State barriers, allows peoples' mobility; that is people can afford exercising their right to choose their place of residence. The framers of the Constitution introduced further protections in the Constitution. For example, they protected us, the people, against a hostile take over of the executive power by establishing the eligibility rules and the oath requirement for the office of the President (Article II), an Impeachment clause for the office of the President, vice-president and all civil officers (Article II, S.4) and they protected us from unjust treatment from a court, by establishing trials by jury (Article III, S.2). They also introduced a requirement for the federal government to guarantee a Republican form of government to every State of the Union (Article IV, S.4), in order to balance the de-centralization clause and avoid State-level tyranny and secession. EMERGING PROBLEMS Problems in our system of government were detected from the very beginning. It is a tribute to the Constitution that, in spite of the problems and the nature of men, the American Experiment has survived. “I weep for the liberty of my country when I see at this early day of its successful experiment that corruption has been imputed to many members of the House of Representatives, and the rights of the people have been bartered for promises of office.” - Andrew Jackson Unfortunately the natural tendency of government to grow has now produced an enormously complex and oversized federal government, which has reduced the power of the States to determine their own policies, has reduced the freedom of the people across all of the United States to choose the government of their liking and has reduced the people’s personal freedoms. This growth tendency at the top levels of government goes directly against our constitution, Article I, Section 8. and against Amendment X. The growth of the federal government has also contributed to an increase of the total investment in government, the cost of government paid by the people, which is now well over its optimum amount (See “Economic Optimalism”). This has reduced the ability of people and industry to produce wealth and reduced the ability of local governments to collect revenues in order for them to maintain citizens safe against criminals, to accomplish local projects or assist the needy in changing their condition in life. Seldom we have been so close to witness the failure of the American Experiment. In past times of crises, such as during World War II and during the cold war, the nation pulled together. We recognized and fought those enemies with unity of purpose. Many people today however, do not seem to recognize or understand the scope and magnitude of the current dangers to our Liberty. It is not enough to elect better representatives, or better judges. When problems become systemic, different solutions need to be sought and applied. Some people think of the Constitution as "unchangeable", while others think of it as "interpretable", or a "living document". Without going into boring legal details, we can say that the Constitution should be changeable, like other laws, but these changes should be rare and difficult (i.e.: should be supported by a great majority of the people). That is why the amendment process is imbedded in the Constitution (Article V) and that is why, among other requirements, this process includes the requirement for three fourths of the States to approve any change to the Constitution. However, it is not true that the Constitution is "a living document", because this would give more power to the courts than to the people's representatives and that would tip the balance of power between them. When in doubt, the courts should interpret the provisions of the Constitution in their literal, original meaning, to the best of their ability: If justices of the court could interpret the law to their own liking, then the whole system of justice would fail. This is especially true with our most precious of the laws, our Constitution. POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS Having talked about possible problems, the good news is that the option of self-government through some form of direct democracy is now more feasible because of modern communication technology. In addition to measures to re-establish a balance of power between our institutions, as initially intended, we can now achieve what has not been possible, for practical reasons, in the past. In small countries, such as San Marino (the oldest surviving Republic) it is possible to call the people for a general assembly. However, in large countries even when a gathering of a million people or a petition of a million names is organized, at great cost of time and money, these represent only a fraction of the total population and often do not receive much media attention. These methods have become essentially ineffective to make an impression on our representatives. How can we, the people, effectively communicate with our representatives on each of the many issues that affect our lives and our freedoms? How can we initiate ideas for legislation and give direction to government instead of the other way around? We may need to conceive new direct-democracy ideas, which initially would be limited in scope, but eventually may represent the fragmentation measures that will help protect the American Experiment to survive and prosper for a number of years to come, in the exponentially developing information age. If you are interested in these ideas, please check the rest of this web site and give us some feedback. Whois

Whois Server Version 2.0
Domain names in the .com and .net domains can now be registered
with many different competing registrars. Go to
for detailed information.
  Registrar: GODADDY.COM, LLC
  Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID: 146
  Whois Server:
  Referral URL:
  Name Server: NS1.ICH-20.COM
  Name Server: NS2.ICH-20.COM
  Status: clientDeleteProhibited
  Status: clientRenewProhibited
  Status: clientTransferProhibited
  Status: clientUpdateProhibited
  Updated Date: 18-jun-2016
  Creation Date: 30-aug-2010
  Expiration Date: 30-aug-2016
>>> Last update of whois database: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 03:30:33 GMT <<<
For more information on Whois status codes, please visit
NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.
TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.
The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and